Zsh vs fish vs nushell. IMO, Nushell shines in …
Discover why Fish Shell.
Zsh vs fish vs nushell rs and with that changed my shell to Fish. Comparative deep-dive into Bash commands vs Zsh and Fish: syntax differences, interactive features, scripting portability, and when to choose each shell. What's special about it is that everything is a data frame. Fish is known for its user-friendly syntax You'll need to add them manually which is fairly simple. I use fish, because I don’t really write non-ephemeral shell scripts any more, and thus context switching between fish and more POSIX-y shells doesn’t really do much to me. "Auto I use fish, because I don’t really write non-ephemeral shell scripts any more, and thus context switching between fish and more POSIX-y shells doesn’t really do much to me. Fish and zsh are probably the most Recently, I had a chat with some of my friends about Nushell and why they stuck with traditional shells like bash/zsh or the "new" hotness like fish Working With Foreign Shell Scripts A common issue with nu is, that other applications export environment variables or functionality as shell scripts, that are expected to then be evaluated by your In this guide, we‘ve explored the world of Linux shells and compared the three most popular options: Bash, Zsh, and Fish. Note: While these shells offer various advantages, the choice of shell often depends on specific use cases, personal preferences, and the In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll dive deep into Zsh vs Fish, exploring their features, performance, customization options, and use cases. IMO, Nushell shines in Discover why Fish Shell. This, compared with the fact that you can get all of Fish’s features with a configured ZSH, is why I’ve been Zsh还具有许多其他有用的功能，包括拼写校正，在多个终端之间共享命令历史记录，命名目录快捷方式等。 Fish 在我看来，Fish，或者“友好的交互式Shell”，是 This behavior extends to "Edit command-line in Editor" as well. ), file paths Nushell is a command line shell like bash, zsh or fish. The best reason to choose fish over zsh is that everything works so well out of the box that you stop messing with it. Ghostty can automatically inject shell integration for bash, zsh, fish, and elvish. Bash vs Zsh vs Fish: Learn the key differences between the top Linux shells in 2025. Nushell is also "interpreted" since At some point in my terminal journey I found out I completely missed out of fish ⌨️ Tech I use: https://kit. fish (Friendly Interactive SHell), Zsh (Z shell), and Bash (Bourne-Again SHell) are probably your best bets out of the 17 options considered. Let us explore some interesting and unique shells. Find the best shell for your Linux workflow. 4 nushell nushell a shell with structured text data processing emphasis, much like PowerShell. 52 Bash vs Fish vs Zsh vs Nushell? ☶ ask unix authored by curiositry 1 year ago (hidden by 5 users) | 81 comments I use fish, because I don’t really write non-ephemeral shell scripts any more, and thus context switching between fish and more POSIX-y shells doesn’t really do much to me. Currently, Warp supports bash, fish, zsh, and PowerShell (pwsh). I only use this terminal for odd jobs, so it’s the perfect environment to get my feet wet in nushell. I've been looking at different shells lately, and while I like Fish's overall philosophy and doing things different from POSIX shells like Bash and Zsh, I looked at Nushell's Cookbook and the way it treats In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore the key differences between ZSH and Fish shell. That was me, too, a few Bash? Zsh? Fish? nushell??I really like Fish, but I just couldn't stick to it. Did you ever notice how little has changed in how we interact with a terminal? Sure, zsh is nicer than sh, tmux is useful - but working in a terminal is still extremely based on text, strange Central to this experience are the shells, which act as the bridge between users and the Linux kernel. Fish is a faster shell than Zsh since the auto-suggestion and completion features are inbuilt (in C++ or Rust) in the Fish binary and they are automatically asynchronous. Nushell goes further with a completely new syntax influenced by functional I have particularly used Bash, Zsh, and fish shells, and here are my thoughts on why switching to fish, or even Zsh, is one of the best things you Let me go over in this video the difference between Bash, ZSH, and Fish, and finally settle the debate on which one is the BEST. Since fish only supports POSIX style escapes for file paths (file\ name. This article will explore three popular Linux shells – Bash, Zsh, and Fish – and delvemore Fish vs. The Since Fish by default comes with a lot of configurations already set, it is believed to be more beginner friendly than other sh options like Zsh. Fish Shell or Nushell? I've been looking at different shells lately, and while I like Fish's overall philosophy and doing things different from POSIX shells like Bash and Zsh, I looked at Nushell's Cookbook and The command-line shell is an essential tool for interacting with the operating system, allowing users to execute commands, automate tasks, and You probably already know about the popular shells like bash and zsh. While Bash immediately executes the command after exiting the editor, Nushell (like other, more modern shells such as Fish and Zsh) I spent 3 years using Fish before switching back to zsh (and later Nushell, which I ended up working on). 1. Bash is the I use fish, because I don't really write non-ephemeral shell scripts any more, and thus context switching between fish and more POSIX-y shells Whether you’re trying to figure out the best shell for Linux, debating Zsh vs Bash, or wondering whether the Fish shell vs Zsh makes more sense for Fish is a solid choice for users who value a user-friendly interface and extensive customization options, while Nushell offers a more minimalist approach with a focus on efficiency and modern syntax. None of them matter for gaming, it's merely preference and use case for your choices. There are fish plugins (albeit not that many like zsh), but you rarely need Syntax and Scripting Fish offers a simpler, more readable syntax compared to Bash, making scripting easier 1. Nushell has super nice, modern documentation compared to bash / zsh. By the end, you’ll see why Fish provides a better overall experience for most users. We‘ve looked at their history, features, and use cases, and Why I Migrated to Fish Shell from Oh My Zsh Choosing a Unix shell boils down to personal preference, specific needs, and the features that one Many of us have gotten used to bash (or zsh/fish/etc), and don't understand why you would need another kind of shell. txt, etc. You're likely to only need zsh-autosuggestions and zsh-syntaxhighlightning. Warp tries to load your login shell by default. On the other hand, nushell tends to give output in the form of charts and ZSH has some features fish doesn't and vise versa, fish has automatic man page browsing, syntax highlighting, full true color support, automaic suggetions and more, while zsh allows for changing zsh for interactive use, because I like a few of it’s extra features vs bash (cd -<tab>, cd this that) and I haven’t bothered with fish yet. Nushell What's the Difference? Fish and Nushell are both powerful command-line shells that offer advanced features and customization options for users. 9K subscribers 1K Bash vs Fish vs Zsh vs Nushell? | Lobsters81 comments I set my default to nushell about a month ago after reading this article posted by @larsyencken. We compare Bash, Zsh, and Fish, with pros and cons to help you decide which is right for you. but I don’t want to accidentally become dependent on their features if I can’t realistically use them on the other thousand machines I’m responsible for. No description has been added to this video. Fish's In this video we compare and contrast Bash, Powershell, Zsh and Fish. I like zsh personally, but bash and fish are perfectly useable. By the end, you’ll know exactly which Bash, Zsh, and Fish each have their own strengths and weaknesses, depending on your needs and level of expertise. g. I recently settled on tumbleweed after deciding that I don’t really like Ubuntu derivative distros, I like tumbleweed’s rolling Here are just some of the extensions possible: [showcase some Zsh plugins and themes] Fish limits addons to "completions" – but prioritizes a simplified experience with smart defaults aimed Nushell is a modern shell that combines a rich programming language with a fully functional shell for efficient and versatile usage. It’s performant, extensible with plugins, and has a modern look and feel compared 1. If your login shell is set to something else (e. The best time to improve shells was 50 years ago. Plus, you'll learn if being POSIX-compliant actually matters Some Ghostty features require integrating with your shell. Fish is a wonderful, mature project, but for me it wasn't quite ambitious enough. This blog post tells the story of my upgrade Explore the key differences between Bash, Zsh, and Fish shells to enhance your software development workflow. It's been a while since I last played around with fish, but I don't remember the documentation "sucking me in" like nushell's. zsh, fish, and bash are probably your best bets out of the 7 options considered. 5 crush crush is similar again to nushell but more of a solo passion project for some Fish, which stands for "Friendly Interactive Shell," is different from Zsh and Bash since it emphasizes out-of-the-box capabilities, straightforward syntax, and user-friendliness. "Customizable" is the primary reason people pick zsh over the Zsh & Fish Are A Trap: Learn How To Use Bash First Brodie Robertson 95. Oh-my-zsh is more of a zshをかれこれ10年ぐらい使っている。 最初のきっかけは忘れたけども、本格的に使うようになったのは2007年ぐらいに書かれた「漢のzsh」とい I changed my prompt configurator from Oh-My-Zsh to Starship. more Nushell is a modern, cross-platform shell that is built with Rust. Discover which shell suits your workflow—scripting, I’d advise for Zsh. With features like syntax highlighting, auto-suggestions, tab completions, and a private mode for secure commands, Fish Shell offers an intuitive and powerful alternative Ion seems much closer in use to what you might expect from a traditional shell and pairs well with starship (also in rust). This is a different mindset Zsh Zsh is for people wanting an interesting mix of a good compatibility with Bash and an ecosystem of plugins with a reasonable Fish is nice because you don't have to spend a lot of effort, plus you can maintain a very minimal, readable configuration. Pretty much EVERYTHING you find on the Web and all the random scripts and tools you find are either for Bash or standard Bash、Zsh 和 Fish 各有优缺点，具体选择取决于你的需求和使用经验。 Bash 是可靠且经过时间考验的选择，注重跨平台的可移植性；而 Zsh 提供了丰富的高级 Nushell operates in a scripting language space typically dominated by "dynamic", "interpreted" languages, such as Python, Bash, Zsh, Fish, and many others. while both are shells nushell has a very distinct and different style compared to POSIX shells (bash, zsh, Elvish vs Fish I’m a Linux beginner and looking to branch out to a better shell. For scripting, bash, though I’m very excited about The non-compliancy extends beyond scripting and also affect interactive use. . co/omerxx/my-battle-station more 将默认 Shell 从 zsh 切换到 Nushell 一个多月了，用下来非常顺手，一句话形容 Nushell 就是：将现代编程语言与 Shell 融合得浑然天成。 It doesn't make a difference in practice but it will print a more consistent output if the completer is ran on it's own. I haven’t tweaked my shell config in 7 or 8 months now. Fish and Nushell are not POSIX compliant, which means you’ll run into many instances where behavior deviates from standard expected shell behavior. I think that bourne shell, bash, fish, zsh, and csh are all able to interact with the unix system in a way that crush, nushell, and other powershell-alikes cannot. Is it better than Fish, Bash, or ZSH? Let' Hi, there most definitely is no straight answer to "which one is better in all cases". lkeojvellnxjgpagtcsbxonlremvmlqgtljxzpyicsejrlarrfgbyfklqjvzbbxdzxsxexo